2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1969 MG MGC
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1.
Because 1969 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 MG MGC (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1969 MG MGC | |
Make | Citroen | MG |
Model | C1 | MGC |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2560 mm |