2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1977 Mazda 818

To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,271 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Mazda 818 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda 818 (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda 818 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Mazda 818 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1977 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C1 (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 818.

Compare all specifications: