2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C1 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C1 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2420 mm |