2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C1 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | C1 | 102 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2160 mm |