2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1991 Volvo 960
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Volvo 960 weights approximately 655 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1991 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C1 | 960 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2780 mm |