2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1992 Volvo 245
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 245 (116 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 245 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1.
Because 1992 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Volvo 245 (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1992 Volvo 245 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1992 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C1 | 245 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2660 mm |