2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1215 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | C1 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 93 L |