2000 Citroen C1 vs. 2003 Honda NSX
To start off, 2003 Honda NSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C1 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Honda NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda NSX (249 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda NSX should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda NSX weights approximately 555 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Honda NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Honda NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Honda NSX (287 Nm @ 5300 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Honda NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1. 2003 Honda NSX has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen C1 has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen C1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Honda NSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C1 | 2003 Honda NSX | |
| Make | Citroen | Honda |
| Model | C1 | NSX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 249 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 287 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 70 L |
