2000 Citroen C1 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C1 would be higher. At 1,784 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 495 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | C1 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1784 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 91.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 45 L |