2000 Citroen C1 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C1 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 655 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen C1 has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen C1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
Model | C1 | ATS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1805 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2775 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 61 L |