2000 Citroen C1 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C1 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 583 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Citroen | Mini |
Model | C1 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 47 L |