2000 Citroen C2 vs. 1961 Jaguar MK IX
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP) has 148 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 815 kg more than 2000 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Jaguar MK IX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Jaguar MK IX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C2 | 1961 Jaguar MK IX | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | C2 | MK IX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 3779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 63 L |