2000 Citroen C2 vs. 1966 Rover P5
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Rover P5 (122 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rover P5 weights approximately 740 kg more than 2000 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Rover P5 (217 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1966 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C2 | 1966 Rover P5 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | C2 | P5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 54 L |