2000 Citroen C2 vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 790 kg more than 2000 Citroen C2.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen C2 has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen C2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C2 | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
Model | C2 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 7446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2960 mm |