2000 Citroen C2 vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 240 (152 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 240 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2000 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 240 (240 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C2 | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C2 | 240 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 152 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 60 L |