2000 Citroen C2 vs. 1983 Holden Camira
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Holden Camira (86 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Holden Camira weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Holden Camira (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1983 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C2 | 1983 Holden Camira | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C2 | Camira |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |