2000 Citroen C2 vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,486 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C2 (72 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C2 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1983 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C2 | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C2 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2420 mm |