2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C3 (72 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 24 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C3 | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Citroen | DKW |
| Model | C3 | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 43 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 31 L |
