2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1964 Morgan 4
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,340 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C3 (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C3 weights approximately 393 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 1964 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Citroen | Morgan |
Model | C3 | 4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1053 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |