2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1965 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 52 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C3 | 1965 Lancia Flavia | |
| Make | Citroen | Lancia |
| Model | C3 | Flavia |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1098 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 56 L |
