2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C3 (72 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C3 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C3 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | C3 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1246 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 33 L |
