2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1966 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lancia Fulvia (80 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C3 weights approximately 152 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C3 (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (104 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 1966 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Citroen | Lancia |
Model | C3 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 934 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 38 L |