2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane

To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Park Lane weights approximately 365 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Mercury Park Lane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Park Lane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (602 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen C3 1967 Mercury Park Lane
Make Citroen Mercury
Model C3 Park Lane
Year Released 2000 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1396 cc 6722 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 89 HP 325 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 200 Nm 602 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 73.7 mm 103 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 995 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 3130 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]