2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (88 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (179 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | |
Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | C3 | W 111 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |