2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1105 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3.
Because 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C3 | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Citroen | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | C3 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 109 L |
