2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1972 Holden Belmont

To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Holden Belmont (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Belmont weights approximately 242 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Holden Belmont (229 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1972 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications: