2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1977 Volvo 66

To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C3 (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.

Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C3 (111 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66. 1977 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: