2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1981 Ford Monarch
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Monarch weights approximately 214 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3.
Because 1981 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 1981 Ford Monarch | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C3 | Monarch |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 4122 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1246 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2800 mm |