2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Acura Integra (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (109 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Acura Integra (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1988 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C3 | 1988 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Citroen | Acura |
| Model | C3 | Integra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |
