2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1988 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Thunderbird (210 HP) has 138 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 464 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1988 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Thunderbird (427 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (112 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1988 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C3 | 1988 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | C3 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1246 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |
