2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C3 weights approximately 73 kg more than 1998 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C3 (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 1998 Acura EL | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | C3 | EL |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |