2000 Citroen C3 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2000 Citroen C3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C3 (88 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 630 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (110 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | C3 | Zo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 83 L |