2000 Citroen C3 vs. 2003 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2003 Smart ForTwo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C3 (109 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2003 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C3 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2003 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C3 (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart ForTwo. (96 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart ForTwo. 2000 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2003 Smart ForTwo has manual transmission. 2003 Smart ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 2003 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | C3 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 67 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.9 seconds | 15.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 33 L |