2000 Citroen C3 vs. 2004 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 208 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 2004 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C3 | 350Z |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 287 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 372 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1252 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 76 L |