2000 Citroen C3 vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1247 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (111 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | C3 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 427 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1053 kg | 2300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 99 L |