2000 Citroen C3 vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 370Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,697 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 370Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3.
Because 2009 Nissan 370Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan 370Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 370Z (270 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 370Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 2009 Nissan 370Z | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C3 | 370Z |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 3697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |