2000 Citroen C3 vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (88 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3. 2000 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C3 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |