2000 Citroen C3 vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (111 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C3 | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Citroen | Citroen |
Model | C3 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |