2000 Citroen C3 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C3 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | C3 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |
