2000 Citroen C5 vs. 1965 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 2000 Citroen C5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lancia Fulvia (80 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C5 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1965 Lancia Fulvia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C5 (110 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Lancia Fulvia. (104 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Lancia Fulvia. 2000 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 1965 Lancia Fulvia has manual transmission. 1965 Lancia Fulvia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 1965 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Citroen | Lancia |
Model | C5 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |