2000 Citroen C5 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2000 Citroen C5 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C5 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Citroen | Sunbeam |
Model | C5 | Tiger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 27 L |