2000 Citroen C5 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Citroen C5 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C5 (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C5 weights approximately 209 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C5 (161 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | C5 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1379 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |