2000 Citroen C5 vs. 1973 Holden UTE

To start off, 2000 Citroen C5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5.

Because 1973 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen C5 1973 Holden UTE
Make Citroen Holden
Model C5 UTE
Year Released 2000 1973
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 5047 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 427 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 77.8 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1390 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 75 L