2000 Citroen C5 vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Citroen C5 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C5 (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C5 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1749 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |