2000 Citroen C5 vs. 1993 Mazda 626

To start off, 2000 Citroen C5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mazda 626 (114 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5.

Because 1993 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mazda 626 (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (115 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen C5 1993 Mazda 626
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C5 626
Year Released 2000 1993
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1989 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 114 HP
Torque 115 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.4:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 60 L