2000 Citroen C5 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2000 Citroen C5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5.
2000 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | C5 | FTO |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 69 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.3 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 10 L/100km |