2000 Citroen C5 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Citroen C5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (314 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
Model | C5 | SS |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |