2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2004 Kia Optima
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (137 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (131 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 3 kg more than 2000 Citroen C5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C5 (314 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 2000 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 2004 Kia Optima | |
Make | Citroen | Kia |
Model | C5 | Optima |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 199 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.9 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |