2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 141 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda MPV weights approximately 393 kg more than 2000 Citroen C5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (115 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C5 | MPV |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 75 L |