2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2008 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Daewoo Evanda (129 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 179 kg more than 2000 Citroen C5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (115 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5. 2008 Daewoo Evanda has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen C5 has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen C5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Daewoo Evanda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C5 | 2008 Daewoo Evanda | |
| Make | Citroen | Daewoo |
| Model | C5 | Evanda |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 129 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 1497 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 65 L |
